NGTO Message Board

NGTO Message Board (http://www.georgia-outdoors.com/forum/index.php)
-   Environmental Issues / Conservation (http://www.georgia-outdoors.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Pebble Mine (http://www.georgia-outdoors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=115126)

GoutUnlimited 01-31-18 04:05 PM

Pebble Mine
 
Looks like a win....for now


https://www.npr.org/2018/01/28/58140...ed-protections

retiredmp 01-31-18 10:33 PM

I hope it remains that way.

JOHNKIES 02-01-18 10:14 AM

Thanks for Update, GU
 
If anyone here thinks I have a "negative attitude" about poachers, ask me what I think of mines like this one ............

Conservation, like democracy, requires constant a constant vigil and preparedness for action. These mining companies will continue the assault by any means at their disposal. The State of Alaska does not want this mine, the native peoples and other residents of the Bristol Bay area do not want it. So who wants it? A corporation not even based in Alaska and all they care about is extracting mineral wealth and then closing down in bankruptcy leaving us with the clean up. Same pattern has been repeated hundreds of times over and over again and still some people will not listen.

Again, thanks for this ray of sunshine and we will all keep our eyes open! --johnkies--

fishmonger 02-01-18 10:55 AM

Great news.

I wonder if those (not talking about anyone here) who were constantly bashing Scott Pruitt and the current Admin about this will now back off a bit, say something positive, or even just not compare him to Satan. The level of hyperbole in some of the articles is crazy. Hatch Magazine comes to mind, and I have engaged a couple of their contributors in discussion on FB after an article is posted, and they are way out there in their thinking.

FM

fishtacos 02-01-18 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fishmonger (Post 891759)
Great news.

I wonder if those (not talking about anyone here) who were constantly bashing Scott Pruitt and the current Admin about this will now back off a bit, say something positive, or even just not compare him to Satan. The level of hyperbole in some of the articles is crazy. Hatch Magazine comes to mind, and I have engaged a couple of their contributors in discussion on FB after an article is posted, and they are way out there in their thinking.

FM

Considering this is a reversal of a previous action by Pruitt and the reversal follows a report brought about by the leak of his super secret schedule showing a meeting with the pebble mine people's shortly before his first action, no I'm not willing to accept that Scottie did this out of the kindness of his heart.

EN 787 02-01-18 02:40 PM

My understanding was that the EPA prior to Pruitt would not allow the company to go through the proper permitting process. All Pruitt had done was allow the company to submit its proposal for review, which was later rejected after the review. I don't think the mine makes sense economically and environmentally based off what I've read about it, but from the start it should have been allowed to go through the proper steps before being rejected.

JOHNKIES 02-02-18 08:27 AM

Pruitt
 
I will say nothing positive about Pruitt, nor will I say anything negative ... at this time. But with Pruitt in charge we all have to watch closely at what the EPA does and does not do. The EPA is a key component at the federal level in keeping our waters clean enough for trout to live in. Remember Pruitt came in on the swing of a government very much opposed to environmental rules and regulations as obstructions to business.

fishtacos 02-02-18 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EN 787 (Post 891768)
My understanding was that the EPA prior to Pruitt would not allow the company to go through the proper permitting process. All Pruitt had done was allow the company to submit its proposal for review, which was later rejected after the review. I don't think the mine makes sense economically and environmentally based off what I've read about it, but from the start it should have been allowed to go through the proper steps before being rejected.

The May, 2017 settlement allowed Pebble to start the process and as I understand it, it never got past the public comment phase. I have also read that Pebble Mine is actually still allowed to submit its permit applications. That said, not sure what point that would be if they're not going to be granted.

EN 787 02-02-18 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOHNKIES (Post 891795)
But with Pruitt in charge we all have to watch closely at what the EPA does and does not do.

I think this could be said for all government past, present, and future.

I will add that the EPA over the past few years has relied on sue and settle as a way of regulation. One story that was not covered by many fishing/outdoor blogs was this story about a guy who owned a small ranch and stocked a man-made watering hole with trout. He got state and local approval but was later fine nearly $40,000 per day by the EPA under the Clean Water Act. He sued and the EPA settled by telling him he had to plant willow trees and limit livestock access to one part of the pond...

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/19/u...ilys-pond.html

fishmonger 02-02-18 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOHNKIES (Post 891795)
I will say nothing positive about Pruitt, nor will I say anything negative ... at this time. But with Pruitt in charge we all have to watch closely at what the EPA does and does not do. The EPA is a key component at the federal level in keeping our waters clean enough for trout to live in. Remember Pruitt came in on the swing of a government very much opposed to environmental rules and regulations as obstructions to business.

I would say he came in on the swing of a government very much opposed to UNREASONABLE rules and regulations as obstructions to business.

FM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright 2010 - North Georgia Trout Online - All Rights Reserved