NGTO Message Board
Welcome to NGTO!
Home ] [ Membership ] [ Donations ] [ Feedback ] [ Stream Reviews ] [ Stream Reports ] [ Maps ] [ Events ] [ Articles ] [ Rules and Regulations ] [ Archives ] Message Board ] FAQ ] [ Hall of Fame ] Sponsors & Supporters ] About ] [ Witticisms ] [ Distinguished Members ]
Welcome to NGTO!

Go Back   NGTO Message Board > NGTO Fishing Forums > General Information
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Photo Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-18, 12:43 PM   #1
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 335
Default Stocking non native trout controversial in OK
trout1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-18, 04:02 PM   #2
iso1600's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: MGM
Posts: 692

that pictured trout sure is UGLY. I wouldn't want any of them in a native smallmouth stream that's for sure
Resident Tenkara Nerd
iso1600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-18, 04:16 PM   #3
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 335

Georgia stocks trout in some native smallmouth streams and Redeye streams
trout1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-18, 09:01 PM   #4
Swamp Angel
Swamp Angel's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lawrenceville, Georgia
Posts: 6,739
Blog Entries: 8

Very interesting article. I've often wondered about the impact of trout on my "home water" of the Chattahoochee through Duluth and Norcross. I dearly love fishing for trout, but I wonder about their impact in this region of the 'Hooch.

I think the main thing is that after the creation of Buford Dam and its tail water, warm water species were going to have a hard time of it between the dam and Bull Sluice near Sandy Springs.

The trout have done quite well in the Chattahoochee National Recreation Area, but to be honest, they are certainly not a native species - whether it be browns or rainbows. But once the dam was in place and the river was changed below it, I believe that it has been a good thing to introduce trout into the new cold water fishery.

Further down river near Cochran Shoals and Powers Ferry, shoal bass may have been adversely affected, but I believe the introduction of trout in these waters after the construction of the dam have been a good thing that has created a fine recreational area and has generated revenue for the state and the GA Dept of Natural Resources.

Mankind has had an effect upon the environment, but mankind has also made an adjustment to make the most of that change in a manner that has minimal adverse impact upon that environment while providing an outlet for sportsmanship and advocacy for environmental stewardship.

(I hope this makes sense. I must admit that I have had two Margaritas in the past hour, so I may be a little sloppy in my typing and in my thought process.)
If you have difficulty understanding the post above, read it out loud and it should make sense. This NGTO member is known for his poor hill-billy upbringing and his affinity for all things from Louisiana (particularly if it relates to LSU). It makes for a poor mix of accents and much difficulty in translation. He was doing well for so long, but now seems to have regressed.
Swamp Angel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-18, 07:36 AM   #5
UncleJesse's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NE Gwinnett
Posts: 2,831

Having caught a few smallmouth on the Tennessee River on my ultra-lite spinning rig I can tell you; if there was a smallmouth stream present and the introduction of trout was going to negatively impact the smallmouth I would be 150% against it.
Want to hear God laugh? Tell Him your plans.
UncleJesse is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2010 - North Georgia Trout Online - All Rights Reserved